English: World map of legal status of euthanasia in 2009. Français : Carte du statut légal de l'euthanasie dans le monde en 2009. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Debates around what has been called ‘assisted dying’ or ‘therapeutic killing’ are complex and often heated. In this cafe, John Saunders and Andrew Edgar (Philosophy, Cardiff University) introduce an exploration of the key moral issues at the heart of this topic to help facilitate further reflection on whether the legal status quo requires change.
Join us at The Gate on Tuesday 21 March from 8.00pm.
The “martial arts”, as an inclusive umbrella term, provide a wide variety of styles and systems from around the world that have a diversity of human movement and training methods that can heal or even harm student-practitioners. Despite their popularity in contemporary societies, the essence of many martial arts as potential lifelong, sustainable and health-giving or curative practices has yet to be considered from a philosophical and a social scientific perspective.
In this cafe, George Jennings (Cardiff Met) delves into case studies from research on the martial arts of China and Mexico by examining the philosophical concept of self-cultivation from a sociological angle. The aim is to stimulate debate and specialist discussion on those martial arts that strive towards self-cultivation through progressive, long-term practice over decades in order to achieve and to maintain mental, physical and social wellbeing beyond the absence of illness – echoing the well-known World Health Organisation definition of health itself.
We start at 8.00pm in the Gate on 20 February 2017.
It’s become evident in recent years that, even within wealthy countries like the UK, there are wide disparities between different regions, cities and even within cities in levels of serious illness and premature deaths. The so-called ‘Glasgow effect’ has, for example, been much reported on. Within Cardiff, there is a documented difference in life expectancy between Lisvane and Fairwater of around 12 years. In this Cafe, Dr Jeremy Segrott asked us to consider why such health inequalities matter, and presented some options that have been suggested for tackling them, each with different ethical and political implications.
While measures such as life expectancy often hit the headlines, these inequalities are more complex than just these numbers alone, and reflect the influence of other inequalities – such as in educational opportunities, access to healthy food, the quality of housing, the extent of pollution in a neghbourhood, and so on. These other inequalities in turn are the product of broader social forces, which mean that tackling health effects at the ‘end of the pipe’, as it were, may not be the most effective or efficient way of addressing the problem. While the focus of media reporting of health inequalities often focuses on how to change individual behaviour, social science research indicates that the deeply entrenched nature of these inequalities will make inteventions that focus on getting individuals to do things differently will be largely ineffective. The ‘social gradient’ in health outcomes remains.
Sir Michael Marmot, NHS Confederation annual conference and exhibition 2010 - Liverpool ACC (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Why does it matter if factors such as gender, class or location make a difference to people’s health over the course of their lives? And if such differences are important, what’s the best way of tackling them?
In 2010, Sir Michael Marmot’s report Fair Society, Heathy Lives affirmed that health inequalities prevent children from getting a good start in life, and obstruct people from enjoying a full range of capabilities. He offered an approach to tackling these inequalities that follows neither of the usual paths taken by health policy. Typically, health interventions are either universal (available to all) or targeted at specific groups or levels of need within society. Each has its own problems. Targeted approaches often struggle to accurately identify those with higher levels of need or disadvantage, and can stigmatise those who are in receipt of them. Universal approaches (traditional in the NHS), for their part, often have poor reach among disadvantaged groups, thus potentially increasing health inequalities. In this Cafe, Dr Jeremy Segrott (Social Sciences, Cardiff University) explores these issues and Marmot’s suggested response to them, which he calls Proportionate Universalism/ How feasible is this way of tackling inequalities? And how likely is it to succeed?
Join us on Tuesday 17 January 2017 from 8.00 pm at The Gate to discuss these issues.
You can watch a talk by Sir Michael Marmott on the report here.
Are sexist, racist, homophobic or other forms of widespread prejudice always a matter of conscious beliefs? In the UK, ever since the trial of the men suspected of killing Stephen Lawrence, the idea of ‘institutional racism’ has been part of public discourse. The idea that racism – the systematic disadvantaging of people based on the colour of their skin or other markers – could be ‘written in’ to institutional practices and rules was hard for some to accept. There is also a substantial body of psychological research, however, to suggest that systematic biases of one kind or another – sexist, racist, homophobic, ‘fattist’ – can exist at the level of preconscious beliefs.
The topic of implicit bias was the subject of last night’s Cardiff Philosophy Café, with a discussion led by Dr Jonathan Webber (Philosophy, Cardiff University). Implicit bias, in Jon’s view, is a topic on which psychological research sheds interesting light, without necessarily allowing us to fully understand all its implications. To do this, a little philosophy is needed, which for Jon means the thought of key figures associated with French Existentialism, namely Simone de Beauvoir and Frantz Fanon.
English: Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir at Balzac Memorial (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Experiments show that someone’s behaviour can manifest racist or sexist attitudes that they don’t agree with. This is a hot topic right now. How does it happen? What can be done about it? We will consider the contributions that two existentialist philosophers, Simone de Beauvoir and Frantz Fanon, can make to understanding this ‘implicit bias’. Their thoughts will help us to see that these experiments may only be picking up one feature of a broader problem.
Join Dr Jonathan Webber (Philosophy, Cardiff University) to discuss the contemporary significance of existentialism on Tuesday 21 June, from 8.00pm at The Gate.
In the meantime, watch Jon talk about central themes from his new book on existentialism for the 21st century.
Elements of genetic engineering (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Here in the UK, it’s now 13 years since the GM Nation debate created a highly charged atmosphere around the use of genetic modification in food crops. Since then, the prospect of climate change coupled with its likely effect on food insecurity in many regions of the global South has placed questions about the social acceptability of GM crops in a new context. On Tuesday 17 May, Dr Hilary Rogers (Cardiff University, Biological Sciences) and Karolina Rucinska (Cardiff University, Geography and Planning) surveyed the current state of play in relation to GM crops, and the persistent ethical questions that surround them.
Elements of genetic engineering (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Here in the UK, it’s now 13 years since the GM Nation debate created a highly charged atmosphere around the use of genetic modification in food crops. Since then, the prospect of climate change coupled with its likely effect on food insecurity in many regions of the global South has placed questions about the social acceptability of GM crops in a new context. In this Café, Dr Hilary Rogers (Cardiff University, Biological Sciences) and Karolina Rucinska (Cardiff University, Geography and Planning) introduce a discussion on the issues that now circulate around GM. What is the current thinking on the benefits and risks that GM crops may hold for industrialised countries, on the one hand, and for agricultural developing countries on the other? Has GM technology changed the way we think about agriculture and the causes of hunger? What are the ethical issues surrounding consumer choice?
Join us to explore these and other questions at The Gate on Tuesday 17 May from 8.00pm.
In the meantime, here’s an opinion piece on why the issues on which public debates on GM crops often focus are the wrong issues. Are public discussions of GM often just repetitions of opposing myths?
Here’s US TV host Jimmy Kimmel getting some vox pops:
And here’s Orchestral Manoeuvres in The Dark’s take…
You can also take our poll, below. Do you think GM crops might have a role to play in the future of agriculture? It’d be great if you could comment on why you voted ‘yes’ or ‘no’ (or maybe why you’re not sure one way or the other) using either the blog comments box below, or if you’re on Facebook, you can use the FB comments function.
What is love? A question that we have all asked and will no doubt ask again – and a pre-occupation of Western and Eastern Philosophy fo rmillennia.
One of the difficulties with understanding what love means is that it seems to mean lots of different things. Humans experience attraction to and intimacy with others in various shapes and forms. Aristotle recognised this, distinguishing between agape (unconditional love, associated with the highest form of spiritual belonging) from eros (romantic and serial love) and also from philia (close friendship or ‘brotherly love’). These ideas might seem old hat, but these concepts – together with other types of love defined by Plato – can help us to better understand the nature of love and how we express it towards ourselves and family, towards other ‘significant others’, and contribute to our communities. How do the ways in which we understandromantic, family and unconditional love in the contemporary world relate to these philosophical definitions and qualities?
Join coach Lana Morris and Reiki practitioner Steve Carroll to explore the meaning of love on Tuesday March 22, from 8.00pm at the Gate.
In the meantime, why not watch this video and take our poll below?